staff augmentation vs consulting

Berry Mathew

Staff Augmentation vs Consulting

Owning a business allows you to have the freedom to choose your staff as you see fit. But, with that said, it comes with a responsibility to consider both budget and efficiency.

Two methods to assist with hiring are staff augmentation vs consulting, which can help you achieve your goals and put together your team. By comparing staff augmentation vs. consulting, you can make an educated decision about which one is right for your business.

General Information About Nearshore Software Development and Hiring

Rather than hiring in-house or even in your country, you may choose a nearshore software development company. This option often saves a company money, streamlines its business processes, and gains access to the expertise it may not have been able to obtain with a U.S.-based company. Fortunately, you may utilize staff augmentation or consult via a nearshore company.

Click here – Top 5 Applicant Tracking System Features Recruiters Need To Know About

Staff Augmentation

Staff augmentation allows a business owner to find a single developer or group of developers who possess the necessary skills for a specific project. It’s an outsourcing model that lets you hire one or more people with skills and knowledge outside of what your in-house team possesses. Sometimes, utilizing this option is advantageous for your company if you have an employee who is centering their efforts on another project or has transferred to another firm.


Staff augmentation works well for businesses with specific goals, such as those that want to add new or more specific skills to the team. This option may reduce how much you spend on training since the individual(s) you receive already have specialized skills and may only need a bit of guidance for your specific needs rather than extensive training.

Compared to a project-based consulting service, this is a more cost-effective solution for companies. You also don’t have as many risks when opting for staff augmentation as you would with hiring additional full-time team members.


Though staff augmentation has its share of pros, there are still some considerations, like the challenge of combining different work styles and techniques into your already existing teams. Ultimately, it can take time to integrate these individuals into your staff, and it only sometimes happens with push-back from your current team.

Because staff augmentation has such a competitive market, you may need help to select the best. When you choose this option, you won’t find someone versatile enough to handle multiple tasks to work toward your end goal.


When comparing staff augmentation vs. consulting, you must understand what consulting is and its benefits and disadvantages.

Consulting is a type of outsourcing, just like staff augmentation. However, when you opt for this option, you hire a software development company through a consulting agency to help you meet specific objectives or goals.

As of now, your in-house staff may only have the knowledge and skills for current projects. You may need skills and knowledge outside of this, which is when you can opt for a consulting agency. The agency will have experts in software development to enhance or add to the skills of your current team. These individuals may have expertise in project planning or management.

Ultimately, a consulting agency performs a broad range of tasks and plays a more fundamental role throughout an entire project than augmented staff, seeing as how augmented staff tend to join a project once you’ve established your company’s vision.

Click here – Types Of Air Filters


When you hire a consulting company, you have access to workers with a broader skill set. Rather than one specific aspect of a project, the consulting firm is beneficial throughout all stages.

Fortunately, when you use this model, you can handle the hassle and expense of hiring in-house. Plus, consulting can lighten the load for your in-house employees.


Project consulting can benefit your company, but it has its drawbacks. For instance, using this option for multiple clients at once isn’t practical. You may also spend more on this option because you hire people with a broader scope who can help during all stages of your projects. Ultimately, this is a one-size-fits-all approach, and you may need to customize it.

Staff augmentation vs. consulting is a complex debate, and there isn’t a correct answer as to which is better for your company. It specifically relates to your needs, desires, and budget.

What is the difference between staff augmentation and project-based consulting services?